Write a note on Manchurian crisis – History Questions and Answers

The Manchurian Crisis, also known as the Mukden Incident, was a significant event that occurred in September 1931 in the region of Manchuria, north-eastern China, which led to the Japanese occupation and establishment of the puppet state of Manchukuo. The crisis marked a turning point in East Asian geopolitics, contributing to tensions between Japan, China, and other major powers, and foreshadowing the broader conflict that would later erupt into World War II.

Background

Manchuria, a resource-rich region in north-eastern China, had been the subject of competing territorial claims and political influence by various regional and international powers, including Japan, China, Russia, and the Western colonial powers. Japan, seeking to expand its sphere of influence and access to resources, had invested heavily in Manchuria’s economy and infrastructure, particularly through the South Manchuria Railway Company (SMRC), which was controlled by the Japanese government and military.

The Incident

On September 18, 1931, a section of the South Manchuria Railway near the city of Mukden (now Shenyang) was dynamited in a staged attack by elements of the Japanese Kwantung Army, Japan’s military presence in Manchuria. The incident was used as a pretext by the Japanese military to justify the occupation of Manchuria and the establishment of a Japanese-controlled puppet government.

Japanese Occupation and Manchukuo

Following the Mukden Incident, Japanese forces swiftly occupied key strategic locations in Manchuria, including major cities, ports, and industrial centers. The Japanese military established a puppet government in Manchuria, known as Manchukuo, and installed the last Qing emperor, Puyi, as the nominal ruler under Japanese control. Manchukuo was effectively a Japanese colony, with Japanese advisors, administrators, and military personnel exercising control over its government, economy, and resources.

READ ALSO:   Discuss the administration of the state during the Pandyan times

International Response

The Manchurian Crisis provoked condemnation and protests from the international community, particularly from the League of Nations, which launched an investigation into the incident. The League of Nations’ Lytton Commission, tasked with investigating the origins and consequences of the Manchurian Crisis, concluded that Japan had violated China’s territorial integrity and sovereignty and called for the withdrawal of Japanese forces from Manchuria.

Impact and Consequences

The Manchurian Crisis had far-reaching consequences for East Asian geopolitics and international relations. It undermined the credibility and effectiveness of the League of Nations as a forum for resolving conflicts and maintaining peace, as Japan ignored the League’s condemnation and continued its occupation of Manchuria. The crisis also intensified tensions between Japan and China, leading to a prolonged period of hostilities and conflict between the two countries.

Legacy

The Manchurian Crisis served as a precursor to broader conflict and aggression in East Asia, culminating in Japan’s full-scale invasion of China in 1937 and the outbreak of World War II in the Pacific. The crisis highlighted Japan’s expansionist ambitions and disregard for international norms and agreements, foreshadowing the broader pattern of aggression and militarism that would characterize Japanese foreign policy in the years leading up to World War II.

In summary, the Manchurian Crisis was a significant event that occurred in September 1931 in Manchuria, north-eastern China, leading to the Japanese occupation and establishment of the puppet state of Manchukuo. The crisis marked a turning point in East Asian geopolitics, intensifying tensions between Japan, China, and other major powers, and foreshadowing the broader conflict that would later erupt into World War II.

READ ALSO:   Write in detail about geography as science, geography as social science and geography as integrative science and discuss its place in the classification of knowledge