What do you understand by the term sanskritisation

Sanskritization is a sociological concept coined by Indian sociologist M.N. Srinivas to describe a process of social mobility and cultural change observed in Indian society. The term “Sanskritization” refers to the upward mobility of lower-caste or lower-class groups through emulation of the customs, rituals, and practices associated with higher-caste or higher-class groups. This process involves adopting the cultural norms, values, and lifestyles of higher-status groups in an effort to gain social prestige, recognition, and mobility within the existing caste hierarchy.

Key Features of Sanskritization

Emulation of Higher-Caste Practices:- Sanskritization involves lower-caste or lower-class groups adopting the customs, rituals, dietary practices, and religious beliefs associated with higher-caste or upper-class groups. This emulation is often motivated by a desire to gain social acceptance, prestige, and upward mobility within the caste hierarchy.

Cultural Transformation:- Sanskritization leads to cultural transformation within lower-caste or lower-class communities as they adopt and internalize the norms, values, and symbols of higher-status groups. This may involve changes in language, dress, diet, religious practices, and social etiquette to align with the customs of higher-caste or upper-class communities.

Social Mobility:- Sanskritization facilitates social mobility for lower-caste or lower-class groups by enhancing their social status and prestige within the caste hierarchy. Through emulation of higher-caste practices, individuals and communities can improve their social standing, gain access to economic opportunities, and achieve greater recognition and respect within society.

Symbolic Capital:- Sanskritization involves the accumulation of symbolic capital, or cultural resources, that confer social status and legitimacy within the caste hierarchy. By adopting the cultural practices and symbols associated with higher-status groups, lower-caste or lower-class individuals can enhance their social capital and prestige, despite their lower socioeconomic position.

READ ALSO:   Write a short note on Parliamentary Sovereignty. Political Science Questions and Answers

Examples of Sanskritization

Adoption of Vegetarianism:- Lower-caste or lower-class groups may adopt vegetarianism, a dietary practice traditionally associated with higher-caste Hindus, in order to align with the customs and values of upper-caste communities and gain social acceptance and respectability.

Change in Naming Practices:- Lower-caste or lower-class individuals may adopt Brahminical naming practices, such as using surnames or titles denoting social status or caste affiliation, to enhance their social standing and prestige within the caste hierarchy.

Religious Practices and Rituals:- Lower-caste or lower-class communities may incorporate Brahminical religious practices, rituals, and ceremonies into their own religious traditions in an effort to elevate their social status and gain recognition within the larger Hindu community.

Critiques and Controversies

While Sanskritization has been widely recognized as a mechanism for social mobility and cultural change in Indian society, it has also faced critiques and controversies. Critics argue that Sanskritization perpetuates caste-based inequalities and discrimination by valourizing upper-caste customs and traditions as superior to those of lower-caste or indigenous communities. Moreover, Sanskritization may reinforce hierarchical notions of purity and pollution, further marginalizing marginalized groups within the caste hierarchy. Additionally, some scholars have questioned the extent to which Sanskritization can lead to substantive social change or structural transformation within Indian society, particularly in the context of persistent caste-based inequalities and discrimination. Despite these critiques, Sanskritization remains a central concept in the study of social mobility, cultural change, and caste dynamics in India.

READ ALSO:   Discuss the models of relationship between bureaucracy and Political executive